It’s January 1st, 2016. Estonia legalises civil unions for same-sex couples. Three days later, an openly gay mayor is elected in deeply religious Salt Lake City. February sees a small West Virginian city council banning sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in the workplace, and on April Fools’ Day the first same-sex couples are married in Greenland. Nobody is laughing. It’s 2016 and the presidential candidate without a comb over is reminding everybody that gay rights are human rights.

In television, LGBT characters are flourishing. The sexless sidekicks and flamboyant queens from the turn of the millennium have been re-imagined. There are queers of colour who don’t get killed off in the second episode. Characters can be bi, pansexual, transgender, and talented musicians who sing for the crown atop their mogul father’s head. GLAAD estimated that LGBT representation had increased in the 2015-2016 season, with cable seeing a noticeable bump from 64 to 84 series regular LGBT characters.

LGBT video game characters are a different story.

Krem of Dragon Age: Inquisition
Be a real boy, Krem. Just like Pinocchio.

Lucien Soulban, the gay Lead Writer at Ubisoft Montreal, cited a fear of reduced sale numbers as the primary reason gay protagonists in AAA games are rare enough to be extinct.

To be trans in a video game in 2016 is to be like Krem from Dragon Age: Inquisition, a side character who is asked questions by the player such as, “Are you a woman?”. There is never an option for the player to add, “Me too,” when Krem announces he is trans. The story’s main protagonist – and the human in front of the screen – is assumed to be cisgender. Krem, a transwoman, was voiced by a straight female. The developer of Inquisition, BioWare, also developed the acclaimed Mass Effect series, which featured marginalised sexualities, lesbian sex scenes, and floating jellyfish that communicate via bioluminescence. Apparently finding trans actors to voice trans characters remains a more difficult feat.

Writers like Soulban and David Gaider, formerly of BioWare, stand at the forefront of the push for LGBT representation in video games. And to have gay writers responsible for the writing of gay characters marks an important step forward.

Why exactly the video game industry lags behind TV and the silver screen in the drive for leading gay characters remains unclear. Certainly there are main characters who can be gay if the player chooses them to be (Max of Life Is Strange springs to mind). But to have gayness be up to the player when heterosexuality is regularly the automatic go-to for any leading character is downright cowardly.

Max from Life is Strange
Max practises voguing in the mirror every day.

All too often, gay characters are shadows and sideshows. Developers prefer to imply gayness rather than outwardly state it, as in the portrayal of Ellie in The Last of Us: Left Behind. Developers get kudos for including LGBT characters, any LGBT characters, as though we are grateful for crumbs of diversity. But gay characters are not significant plot points – they are footnotes in stories, attractions to stare at but never delve beneath. Main characters are explicitly heterosexual; gay characters are implicitly homosexual. Are straight male gamers so assumed to be a game’s core audience that to have a gay main character would be uncomfortable and upsetting? Why are we underestimating players and paying more attention to Lara Croft’s boob physics than whether she has merit as a human being?

To be gay is not to have your life oriented around sex. And being gay in a game needn’t affect the gameplay to the extent a main character’s sexuality is forced down a player’s throat every second of the story.

Instead of pandering to the vocal discomfort of a minority of consumers – those uncomfortable with any hint of gayness – game developers should challenge them with LGBT main characters that have interests, depth, soul, and a lion’s share of the game’s limelight.

The Celluloid Closet, a 1995 documentary based on the book of the same name, tracked 100 years of change in the depiction of gay, lesbian, bisexual and (to some degree) transgender characters in film. LGBT characters were once sissies exploited for laughs, depressed victims on the edge, or villainous freaks to be feared. It wasn’t until the late 80s and 90s that queer cinema came to a mainstream audience. And it was only through a wide variety of character depictions that the public’s idea of what it means to be queer was challenged and changed.

Rarely today does a game developer show an LGBT character in a negative light for entertainment value. Yet rarely do games put LGBT characters in the spotlight at all.

And in 2016 that is a problem.

  • Mike G

    Interesting article, although I do question the logic that says “…but to have gayness be up to the player when heterosexuality is regularly the automatic go-to for any leading character is downright cowardly.” Now I hope you are not suggesting that all games should become about, or focus on, gender choice. Especially after you’ve said, “To be gay is not to have your life oriented around sex. And being gay in a game needn’t affect the gameplay to the extent a main character’s sexuality is forced down a player’s throat every second of the story.”

    If you beleive your statement to be true, then it should be perfectly fine for Naughty Dog or Bioware to have sexual orientation implicitly stated, and leave it up to the player and not force an LGBT character down the players throat. The issue is that in the vast majority of games, the sexual orientation of the player character is a completely moot point. I really don’t think sexual orientation should become the de facto characteristic of game characters. The vast majority of games are played without a single thought given to the characters sexual orientation, these discussion have only really come about because games (mostly RPGs) have become bigger, and now have more depth and characterisation. However the sexual orientation of the character need not take centre stage, and become the defiing issue of the game.

    For example, Is Lara Croft LGBT? Surely that’s been left up to the player, as far as I’m aware – and does it have to be explicitly stated either way? Moreover this touches on another issue, the one of sexualisation. Lesbians find women sexually attractive, so why is there a complaint about “boob physics”? Surely boob physics cater to both the heterosexual AND LGBT communities, or are you suggesting that only trans or androgynous characters will suffice in this regard? Can we no longer celebrate what is considered ‘sexy’? Or is it just that we can longer celebrate what heterosexuals consider to be sexy?

    If we are really going to press this issue of representation in games, let me give you some statistics. The population of those with disability in the US is about 19%. Hispanic-Americans make up 17% of the general population. African-Americans make up 13% of the population. While those who identify as LGBT make up 4% of the population.

    If the issue is one of representation in games, why should LGBT character be “given the spotlight” over and above Hispanic-Americans, African-Americans or those who have a disabiality? How many games can you recall where the main charater is Hispanic, Black, or has a disability?

  • Nathan Brown

    This is a fantastic article.